REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
AND RECORD OF ACTION
August 4, 2026
FROM
LUTHER SNOKE, Chief Executive Officer, County Administrative Office
SUBJECT
Title
Ratify Election to Continue to Receive Funding Under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000
End
RECOMMENDATION(S)
Recommendation
1. Ratify the Chief Executive Officer’s election to continue to receive a share of funding from the Federal Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000, as amended, under the State of California’s 25-percent rolling average option.
2. Delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer to elect to continue to receive a share of funding from the Federal Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000, as amended, through December 31, 2032.
(Presenter: Luther Snoke, Chief Executive Officer, 387-4811)
Body
COUNTY AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER GOALS & OBJECTIVES
Operate in a Fiscally-Responsible and Business-Like Manner.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Approval of this item will not result in the use of Discretionary General Funding (Net County Cost). The County has elected to continue to receive the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination (SRS) Act funding under the 25-percent rolling average payment method. Based on the estimated payment report obtained from the United States Forest Service (USFS) website, which was updated on May 12, 2026, the estimated minimum County share is $936,532.98 for 2026. These funds will be split equally between the County and public schools in accordance with Government Code section 29484, resulting in the County receiving an estimated share of $468,266. These funds are not currently accounted for in the County’s 2026 Budget. A recommendation regarding the use of these funds will be included in a future budget report.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
In 1908, Congress enacted a law that requires 25 percent of the revenues derived from National Forest System lands be paid to states for use by the counties in which the lands are situated for the equal benefit of public schools and roads. These National Forest System revenues had been collected primarily from timber sales, however as timber sales declined, revenue to counties also declined. As a result of this decline, Congress recognized the need to stabilize payments to counties, and on October 30, 2000, the SRS Act of 2000, Public Law No. 106-393, was enacted. The SRS Act provided five years (fiscal years 2002 through 2006) of transitional assistance to rural counties affected by the decline in revenue from timber harvests on federal lands and provided the counties with the option to remain under the 25-percent Payment Method with fluctuating funding levels or change to the Full Payment Method, which required counties to designate 15% to 20% of these revenues to be allocated to either Title II or Title III projects under the Act.
On September 4, 2001 (Item No. 6), the Board of Supervisors (Board) approved changing from the 25-percent Payment Method to the Full Payment Method with 20% of the funds being used for Title III projects. Title III involves County projects that may include search and rescue services, community service work camps, easement purchases, forest related educational opportunities, fire prevention, county planning to reduce the impact of development on adjacent Federal lands, or community forestry. This election was utilized through Federal fiscal year 2006-07.
On May 25, 2007, the Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act of 2007, Public Law No. 110-28 included a provision for payments to States and Counties for fiscal year 2007 and extended provisions of Title II and Title III of the SRS Act for one more year. As a result of this extension, on September 18, 2007 (Item No. 43), the Board elected to continue with the Full Payment Method and continue to utilize 20% of the funds for Title III projects.
On October 3, 2008, Public Law No. 110-343 (Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008) included a section that amended and reauthorizes the SRS Act for fiscal years 2008 through 2011. Counties were required to elect to receive one of the following payments: (1) a share of the State’s 25-percent rolling average payment or (2) a share of the State payment (formula payment). For California, the State payment is actually a transition payment in lieu of the State payment. If the 25-percent payment option was elected, the election was effective for two years and the funding would be split equally between public schools and roads. If the State payment was selected, the election could not be changed in subsequent years. Additionally, the State payment option required counties to provide an allocation of 15% to 20% of its share to Title II, Title III, or a combination. As a result of this extension and upon review and analysis of the data provided by the USFS of these two options, on December 9, 2008 (Item No. 80), the Board elected to receive payment under the State’s 25-percent rolling average payment.
On August 10, 2010 (Item No. 21), the Board approved the County’s election to continue to receive its share of funding from the SRS Act under the State’s 25-percent rolling average payment option. In 2010, this election provided the County with a share of $317,916 versus a projected State payment of $249,735.
On July 6, 2012, the SRS Act was reauthorized for federal fiscal year 2012 as part of Public Law 112-141. On August 7, 2012 (Item No. 23), the Board approved the County’s election to continue to receive its share of funding from the SRS Act under the State’s 25-percent rolling average payment option. In 2012, this election provided the County with a share of $293,219 versus a projected State payment of $185,918.
On November 15, 2021, the Secure Rural Schools program was reauthorized for three years (2021-23) by the 2021 Infrastructure Bill and became Public Law No. 117-58.
On August 8, 2023 (Item No. 18), the Board approved the County’s election to continue to receive its share of funding from the SRS Act under the State’s 25-percent rolling average payment option. In 2023, this election provided the County with a share of $392,600 versus a projected State payment of $167,500.
On June 9, 2026, the County was contacted by the California State Association of Counties regarding the requirement to complete and submit an “FY 2026 Payment to States Title Election Form,” which outlines how each qualifying county will be allocating SRS funds. Upon review and analysis of the data provided by the USFS, of the two options to receive payment, it is recommended the County elect to continue to receive payments under the State’s 25-percent rolling average payment. In 2026, this election will provide the County with an estimated share of $468,266 versus a projected State payment of $161,556. Currently, there is no information on future SRS reauthorizations after 2026.
This ratification is necessary as the SRS Act allocation identification was needed by June 30, 2026, to meet the USFS August 1, 2026 deadline. In order to meet the required deadline, the FY 2026 Payment to States Title Election Form was reviewed, approved and signed by County Counsel on June 26, 2026, and the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) on July 29, 2026.
Recommendation No. 2 will delegate authority to the CEO to make an election under the SRS Act through December 31, 2032, in order to facilitate timely submission of the required State documentation, if there are future disbursements after 2026. The CEO will incorporate any additional funding received in future budget reports.
PROCUREMENT
Not applicable.
REVIEW BY OTHERS
This item has been reviewed by County Counsel (Julie Surber, Principal Assistant County Counsel, 387-5455) on July 13, 2026; and County Finance and Administration (Erika Rodarte, Administrative Analyst, 387-4919) on July 13, 2026.