San Bernardino header
File #: 6191   
Type: Consent Status: Passed
File created: 6/6/2022 Department: Probation
On agenda: 6/14/2022 Final action: 6/14/2022
Subject: Revenue Contracts with School Districts to Provide School-Based Probation Officers
Attachments: 1. CON-PROB-6-14-22-Revenue Contract with Morongo Unified School District to Provide School-Based Probation Officer, 2. CON-PROB-6-14-22-Revenue Contract with Needles Unified School District to Provide School-Based Probation Officer, 3. CON-PROB-6-14-22-Revenue Contract with San Bernardino City Unified School District to Provide School-Based Probation Officer, 4. CON-PROB-6-14-22-Revenue Contract with San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools to Provide School-Based Probation Officer, 5. CON-PROB-6-14-22-Revenue Contract with Upland Unified School District to Provide School-Based Probation Officer, 6. CON-PROB-6-14-22-Revenue Contract with Victor Valley Union High School District to Provide School-Based Probation Officer, 7. CON-PROB-6-14-22-Revenue Contract with Adelanto Elementary School District to Provide School-Based Probation Officer, 8. CON-PROB-6-14-22-Revenue Contract with Apple Valley Unified School District to Provide School-Based Probation Officer, 9. CON-PROB-6-14-22-Revenue Contract with Bear Valley Unified School District to Provide School-Based Probation Officer, 10. CON-PROB-6-14-22-Revenue Contract with Chaffey Joint Union High School District to Provide School-Based Probation Officer, 11. CON-PROB-6-14-22-Revenue Contract with Chino Valley Unified School District to Provide School-Based Probation Officer, 12. CON-PROB-6-14-22-Revenue Contract with Colton Unified School District to Provide School-Based Probation Officer, 13. CON-PROB-6-14-22-Revenue Contract with Cucamonga School District to Provide School-Based Probation Officer, 14. Item #45 Executed BAI, 15. 22-456 Executed Contract, 16. 22-457 Executed Contract, 17. 22-458 Executed Contract, 18. 22-459 Executed Contract, 19. 22-460 Executed Contract, 20. 22-461 Executed Contract, 21. 22-462 Executed Contract, 22. 22-463 Executed Contract, 23. 22-464 Executed Contract, 24. 22-465 Executed Contract, 25. 22-453 Executed Contract, 26. 22-454 Executed Contract, 27. 22-455 Executed Contract
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
AND RECORD OF ACTION

June 14, 2022

FROM
TRACY REECE, Chief Probation Officer, Probation Department

SUBJECT
Title
Revenue Contracts with School Districts to Provide School-Based Probation Officers
End

RECOMMENDATION(S)
Recommendation
Approve revenue contracts in the aggregate amount of $900,816 with the following 13 school districts for the provision of school-based Probation Officers at a cost not to exceed $32,172 per each assigned full-time Probation Officer, for the period July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023:
1. Adelanto Elementary School District - three probation officers ($96,516).
2. Apple Valley Unified School District - two probation officers ($64,344).
3. Bear Valley Unified School District - one probation officer ($32,172).
4. Chaffey Joint Union High School - one probation officer ($32,172).
5. Chino Valley Unified School District - two probation officers ($64,344).
6. Colton Unified School District - one probation officer ($32,172).
7. Cucamonga School District - one probation officer ($32,172).
8. Morongo Unified School District - one probation officer ($32,172).
9. Needles Unified School District - 0.75 probation officer ($0).
10. San Bernardino City Unified School District - three probation officers ($96,516).
11. San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools - six probation officers ($193,032).
12. Upland Unified School District - two probation officers ($64,344).
13. Victor Valley Union High School District - five probation officers ($160,860).
(Presenter: Tracy Reece, Chief Probation Officer, 387-5692)
Body

COUNTY AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER GOALS & OBJECTIVES
Provide for the Safety, Health and Social Service Needs of County Residents.
Pursue County Goals and Objectives by Working with Other Agencies and Stakeholders.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Approval of this item will not result in the use of additional Discretionary General Funding (Net County Cost...

Click here for full text