San Bernardino header
File #: 7097   
Type: Consent Status: Passed
File created: 11/4/2022 Department: Superintendent of Schools
On agenda: 11/15/2022 Final action: 11/15/2022
Subject: Williams Settlement, 2021/2022 Annual Report
Attachments: 1. ATT-SCL-11-15-22-Williams Annual Report 2021-2022, 2. Item #91 Executed BAI
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
AND RECORD OF ACTION

November 15, 2022

FROM
TED ALEJANDRE, County Superintendent, San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools

SUBJECT
Title
Williams Settlement, 2021/2022 Annual Report
End

RECOMMENDATION(S)
Recommendation
Receive the Williams Settlement Fiscal Year 2021/2022 Annual Report as required pursuant to Section 1240(c)(2)(A)(i) of the Education Code describing the state of the schools in the county that are ranked in Deciles 1-3, currently based on the 2012 Base Academic Performance Index.
(Presenter: Ted Alejandre, County Superintendent, 386-2407)
Body

COUNTY AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER GOALS & OBJECTIVES
Pursue County Goals and Objectives by Working with Other Agencies and Stakeholders.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The approval of this action is non-financial in nature, and therefore, does not impact Discretionary General Funding (Net County Cost).

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The Williams Lawsuit Settlement, reached and enacted into law in August 2004, has set the standard for providing equitable educational opportunities and closing the achievement gap in San Bernardino County and throughout California. Williams legislation has provided an opportunity for county and district superintendents to work collaboratively to support and assist underperforming schools to improve student achievement.

The American Civil Liberties Union filed Williams v. California in 2000 on behalf of the plaintiffs - nearly 100 students from San Francisco County - as a class action lawsuit against the State of California and its educational agencies. The basis of the lawsuit was that public-school agencies failed to provide public school students with equal access to instructional materials, safe and clean school facilities, and qualified teachers. The issue of equity for disadvantaged and minority students, particularly in large and urban school districts, was the crux of the case.

...

Click here for full text